Categories
Twitter
« The Worgen: Past, Present, or Future? | Main | What Does Icecrown Bring? Part II »
Monday
Oct122009

World of Raids Prods Icecrown Lore

As webmaster of LoreCrafted, I tend to get messages from across the WoW-related community regarding lore, speculation, and upcoming story changes.  One of the things I receive every-so-often are links to lore articles on other sites, with a general request to give my opinion on whatever the subject matter may be at the time.

Recently, a colleague linked me to this article on World of Raids. And while I do have certain reservations about their plot speculation, my personal beliefs on the matter are such that speculation should be "fair game." Speculation is fun and gets the mind working on plot possibilities, and no part of me wishes to discourage such a thing. However, I wouldn't mind joining in the discussion a bit.

So this article serves as a counterpoint / discussion to the World of Raids article, touching upon a few quotes and examining things from a LoreCrafted point of view.  I also wish to address in this article a few distinct pieces of information that are simply incorrect. LoreCrafted was built to help combat incorrect or misunderstood lore, and that is one of the purposes I wish to serve today. And if there are high profile sites out there writing articles using incorrect or outdated information, then there are definitely readers out there with the same misconceptions.

I will quote from the article linked and address each specific quote below:

 

"It's almost a given that someone is going to take the reigns [sic] from Arthas (the Lich King) at the end of Icecrown Citadel: The Frozen Throne and be the bext big-baddie once Deathwing is finally taken out."

This quote straddles the line between declaration of fact and simple speculation. I include it here, though, for one reason: why does it have to be a 'given' that someone will take the reins of the Lich King and become the big baddie after Deathwing? We have more than enough pre-existing lore villains to fill that slot without rehashing the "frozen undead" arc. Not only do we have Azshara, who's actually mentioned in the Cataclysm information and possibly being groomed for an eventual in-game debut, but we also still have at least three Old Gods left per original count. And then there's also Kil'jaeden, who's not dead, and even big baddie Sargeras, whose voice we heard during the Wrathgate event.

And what about the Titans? While they're not inherently evil, some of them ARE cold and calculating enough to become a threat to the mortal races of Azeroth.

There is a frighteningly common belief among many World of Warcraft players that we're killing off our villains too quickly and that we'll not have any left. This is simply not true. There are many villains remaining nestled quietly throughout the lore of this world, and there are still many old heroes left we have yet to see (Turalyon and Alleria being two of them).

 

"It's the textbook 'mad-with-vengeance' story to a t, with [Tirion's] sanity on the brink as he pushes harder and harder to topple the Frozen Throne and bring Arthas to 'justice.'"

I have to ask here for evidence that Tirion's sanity is on the brink. Certainly, he grieves for his son's death, but every encounter we've had with Fordring has shown him to be an upstanding man who wears the heavy burden of his tasks. It was even Tirion who discovered that Arthas was irredeemable, a fact he'd only care to mention if redemption was on his mind.

Remember that Tirion is one of the last bastions of the old Silver Hand order. If Blizzard were to drive HIM crazy, too, it would just be bad storytelling. But that's simple opinion.

 

"Is it really about justice anymore for Tirion? He sure didn't seem to care about justice when he allowed the Alliance and Horde to slaughter each other in Crusaders' Coliseum; kind of like when Arthas mercilessly slaughtered the citizens of Stratholme, or when he turned on the mercenaries he paid to destroy the ships in Northrend, just before they would have recalled his expedition prior to finding Frostmourne."

So I have to quote one of my guildmates on this one:

"Did he actually compare the Coliseum to Stratholme...?"

I have to be honest when I say that comparing Tirion's actions in the Coliseum to those of Arthas in Stratholme is a little bit of a stretch. Tirion's words in the Coliseum, especially in regards to the conflict between the Horde and the Alliance, are saturated with regret and resignation. He does not want to allow the conflict, but he understands that he has to pander to the whims of the leaders, or else the Northrend offensive could crumble.

And if you take a step back and look at this from a pure literary perspective, rehashing the same "fall from grace" story arc would, much like the previous quote regarding Tirion above, just be bad storytelling.

 

"Darion originally wielded the Corrupted Ashbringer, though how he came across it is unknown."

The tale of how Darion acquired the Corrupted Ashbringer was told nearly a year ago, in the four part comic miniseries named after the sword itself (World of Warcraft: Ashbringer).

To summarize, Darion faced the Four Horsemen in Naxxramas and was able to take the Corrupted Ashbringer from his father. The whispers of the sword lead Darion to the Scarlet Monastery, where the spirit of Alexandros Mograine killed his other son, Renault Mograine, in vengeance for his betrayal. Later, Darion ran himself through with the Corrupted Ashbringer in an attempt to exchange his soul for his father's, setting it free amongst the thousand other souls buried beneath Light's Hope Chapel. That act, An Act of Love, decimated the Scourge attack on Light's Hope that was happening at the time.

 

Reading through the comments of the article, there are a few pieces of speculation that jive with my own thoughts, and a few that just don't. Ultimately, however, the post does bring up some of the long-standing questions regarding the closure of Wrath of the Lich King.

What happens to the Scourge? What will the Lich King's ultimate fate be? What of Bolvar Fordragon, Darion Mograine, Tirion Fordring, and Saurfang?

Patch 3.3 is coming soon, and these mysteries will be revealed to us.

 

 

Reader Comments (8)

I read that as well, and he does have some interesting points, although some of it, as you pointed out have already been explained in the comics. If we do kill the Lich King, what is really stopping someone from picking up Frostmourne and putting on the armor and becoming the new Lich King? I know that the Blues have stated that they won't be making Frostmourne a drop and that they have special plans for it, so something has to happen to it, either destroyed completely, picked up by someone else or disappears into the Twisting Nether, that sort of thing. In regards to the armor, we know that in the book Arthas "destroys" his human side as well as Ner'zhul and fully becomes the LK, but it doesn't really explain that since he did that, does it mean that the armor no longer house Ner'Zhul's soul? That it is now a piece of metal armor?

And finally, what is Mal'Ganis' role in all this? I doubt that he is just going to stand aside and let the Alliance/Horde beat up the LK. Hopefully he appears at the end, or after everyone has left since his revenge on the LK as well as the A/H are tops on his list, according to his little speech after you beat him up in the Hidden Hollow.

I'm curious to your speculation on this. Richard.

October 13, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterKLRMNKY

Scheduled for Thursday, I believe, I have a "what I'd like to see happen in Icecrown" article coming that should answer your questions about my opinion. I speculate about the role that Mal'ganis and the Burning Legion could play.

For the next two days, however, I have a couple of articles focusing on the worgen and their upcoming role in cataclysm. I figured we needed a brief break from all the Icecrown speculation so I chose to poke and prod at what we know about the worgen for two articles.

October 13, 2009 | Registered CommenterRichard 'Greyseer' Powell

Can't wait. It should be a very interesting read, considering how much of a role that worgen have had in game and hopefully the return of a certain nelf and her favorite scythe....

October 13, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterKLRMNKY

I know you said you will show us Thursday but here is a thought that has been rolling around in my brain since I first did the Death Knight starting area. It has been mentioned the in the new raid instance that we will face the Lich King's greatest death knight. Up to now, I have heard many people speculate that is Bolvar or Saurfang the Younger. My thought is this...Darion's father, Alexandros (spelling?). His soul was captured in the dream/spell sequence and Arthus does say his soul is now his.
Sorry, I had to put it out there and your blog, Richard, seems to be a good place to do that.
Thanks for the great blog.

October 13, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSoupe

Someone on the WOW forums said that there was an allaince quest where you go to the sprit world, and if you go to a certain area, you run into Arthas. He says that he could sense the pressence of powerful shaman magics at work, for he once was a shaman, and then precedes to kill your character.

Arthas was never a shaman...that was Nerzhul...

October 13, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDerathenus

@Soupe: Indeed, there are truly 3 potential "best death knight" possibilities. Alexandros is, indeed once of them. A part of me thinks that it will be dependent upon which faction "wins" the encounters (in other words, it will change depending on whether you're Alliance or Horde). SOMEthing has to happen in Icecrown for Darion's story to close, and a part of me believes that a mutual death between him and his father could be interesting to see.

@Derathenus: Yes, Ner'zhul was the one being referred to in that quest. But the Lich King that we know today is a merger of the two entities: Arthas and Ner'zhul. It was stated by Blizzard as far back as The Frozen Throne that, when Arthas donned the helm, the two beings merged to become one.

The Arthas novel further reinforced this idea. It's no longer two separate beings, but one being made up of both. So the Lich King has the right to make the claim that he did.

October 13, 2009 | Registered CommenterRichard 'Greyseer' Powell

"And then there's also Kil'jaeden, who's not dead, and even big baddie Sargeras, whose voice we heard during the Wrathgate event."

When did we hear Sargeras during Wrathgate? Unless it's during the phased Horde-side part after the cutscene battle (I've only done the quest chain with the Alliance), I seem to have missed something pretty major...

October 13, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterVeliaf

It was, indeed, during the Hordeside event. It may have been with 3.1 or 3.2, but prior to one of those patches, the "mysterious voice" that chides Varimathras for failing him was unlabeled. Recently, however, there was a sound file added with an actual voice attached to that line, and the sound file is clearly labeled "Sargeras."

No, it's not an explicit in-lore admission to Sargeras's whereabouts, but it IS a clear indication of what Blizzard intended: Sargeras is back out there again. Ol' boy will be coming back soon enough...

October 13, 2009 | Registered CommenterRichard 'Greyseer' Powell

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>